This is again a dangerous line of thinking. A fund may be giving a higher return purely because it is taking higher risk. A fund that generates 15% return with 20% volatility is surely better than a fund that generates 20% return with 60% volatility. Greater the volatility, greater the chances of the fund earning negative returns. Don’t judge a fund by returns. There is an important risk aspect to it. Always look at returns adjusted for risk. That is a better benchmark to measure and compare funds. That is why you must also consider other measures of returns like Sharpe and Treynor which are also risk adjusted returns measures.
This is again a dangerous line of thinking. A fund may be giving a higher return purely because it is taking higher risk. A fund that generates 15% return with 20% volatility is surely better than a fund that generates 20% return with 60% volatility. Greater the volatility, greater the chances of the fund earning negative returns. Don’t judge a fund by returns. There is an important risk aspect to it. Always look at returns adjusted for risk. That is a better benchmark to measure and compare funds. That is why you must also consider other measures of returns like Sharpe and Treynor which are also risk adjusted returns measures.